|
Post by Commander J. MacGyver on Nov 18, 2006 11:39:01 GMT -5
Thats very rude
|
|
Rudger Mcvanlen
Chief Warrant Officer http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v733/NicholasReitt/Ranks/Red/WarrantOffi
Master Staff Sargeant
"Call me sarge, give me a segre and a phasor rifle and let me handle the rest"
Posts: 234
|
Post by Rudger Mcvanlen on Mar 7, 2007 17:15:46 GMT -5
heh... sorry i think its funny he wants to PO the pope... thats just funny to me.
and as to my belife, i think its totaly fine. marry all you want, its nowone elses buisness realy. i mean why the hell dos anyone care who someone else marrys...like wtf? thats what i think.
|
|
|
Post by Commander J. MacGyver on Mar 7, 2007 19:14:57 GMT -5
I just wish they woulddent use the word Marrege. Like Get your own damn word, we had it first. Other than that i dont give a shit.
|
|
Rudger Mcvanlen
Chief Warrant Officer http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v733/NicholasReitt/Ranks/Red/WarrantOffi
Master Staff Sargeant
"Call me sarge, give me a segre and a phasor rifle and let me handle the rest"
Posts: 234
|
Post by Rudger Mcvanlen on Mar 7, 2007 20:48:55 GMT -5
last i checked we were all humans lol. why should they change it? witch actualy reminds me of a south park episode where they tryed to change the word used for marriage for gay people...it didint work so well... =P
|
|
|
Post by martog on Mar 10, 2007 3:12:25 GMT -5
last i checked we were all humans lol. why should they change it? witch actualy reminds me of a south park episode where they tryed to change the word used for marriage for gay people...it didint work so well... =P Ofcourse being a traditionalist, I do not support the exact question asked, however, I am not opposed to the unity of two people of the same gender, nor what ever they do... late at night. I simply agree, sort of, with Mac, in that, Marriage should be between a man and woman, and I hate seeing it being used incorrectly, it you'st to be under god, but now thats gone, the more we change the meaning of the word 'marriage' the less value it holds. I believe that a man and a man or a woman and a woman, should be allowed to be united in a seperate ritual, that is very similar to marriage, but totally a different thing. Also, now that I have just rocked the boat a bit, I may as well keep going, I am apposed to IVF, its just sickening to imagine a child with two mums, or two dads! I mean its incredible that humans would push it this far, its bad enough people who cannot have kids naturally have kids artificially, but to have two people of the same sex, for petes sake, adopt a bloody child, don't just manipulate your genes to create a child not born of woman... well now i've done it for sure this time.
|
|
Rudger Mcvanlen
Chief Warrant Officer http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v733/NicholasReitt/Ranks/Red/WarrantOffi
Master Staff Sargeant
"Call me sarge, give me a segre and a phasor rifle and let me handle the rest"
Posts: 234
|
Post by Rudger Mcvanlen on Mar 10, 2007 5:08:06 GMT -5
ya it is kind of wierd... but of course they can allways ask a firend to ahhh err... you know "bow chicka a bow wow" with them to make a kid, i have heard of that being done alot of times.
((note, "bow chicka bow wow" is a line used by tucker from R vB, and is Trade marked as their property... so err ya...))
|
|
|
Post by martog on Mar 10, 2007 8:31:07 GMT -5
Right...
this isn't about IVF, I just threw that in their
the point I was making was in relation to gay marriage as per the thread topic.
|
|
Rudger Mcvanlen
Chief Warrant Officer http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v733/NicholasReitt/Ranks/Red/WarrantOffi
Master Staff Sargeant
"Call me sarge, give me a segre and a phasor rifle and let me handle the rest"
Posts: 234
|
Post by Rudger Mcvanlen on Mar 10, 2007 14:03:57 GMT -5
and i ment that a gay guy or chick can adopt or, screw a non gay firend to have a kid. gay people do that aswell, i was just throwing it out there...
|
|
|
Post by martog on Mar 31, 2007 7:50:14 GMT -5
Well I think everyone would agree that gay marridge in itself is wrong, gay unity is a seperate manner, however they should not be allowed to misuse the word that should 'only' stand for the unity of a man and woman under god, ok maybe not even the god part, anyone want to comment?
|
|
|
Post by Commander J. MacGyver on Mar 31, 2007 16:39:49 GMT -5
Thats what I've been saying. I might be religius but I have no problems witht the Homosexual comunaty(altho they could shut up some times) I just what them to not use the word 'Marrage' go ahead get cupeld and be a family.
|
|
|
Post by martog on Mar 31, 2007 21:49:18 GMT -5
yeh... family of 'two' on this topic slightly, what about gay adoption? I am apposed to it, if ur gay, then ur not meant to have children, or you've chosen not too really, just like what I said about IVF, only a man and woman should conceive or adopt a child, so I think a 'family' of more than two members has to start from a hetrosexual couple.
|
|
Rudger Mcvanlen
Chief Warrant Officer http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v733/NicholasReitt/Ranks/Red/WarrantOffi
Master Staff Sargeant
"Call me sarge, give me a segre and a phasor rifle and let me handle the rest"
Posts: 234
|
Post by Rudger Mcvanlen on Apr 1, 2007 0:24:08 GMT -5
dude thats just wrong... you would rather some kid dies in some 3ed world country, or stays in our horribly ill made foster care system then be adopted by a gay couple? thats evil right there...
|
|
|
Post by martog on Apr 1, 2007 4:36:49 GMT -5
thats not evil, its evil to even 'think' to allow a child to be raised my non-hetrosexuals, thats evil, im sure mac would agree with me, and 'our' foster care system isn't 'my' foster care system, its 'yours' in australia we give enough money to foster care places to look after the children left there. I can't comment on the american system, as I have no frame of reference in which to debate how well they treat children other than the 1950s playwrite; Any...
So you see John, its not evil its sensible, wouldn't you agree ol' boy? *puts right hand on chin and faces Nick*
|
|
|
Post by litchfield on Apr 1, 2007 12:25:44 GMT -5
Its gay/lesbians choices....they have the right to decide what they do...who are we to stand in their way?
|
|
|
Post by martog on Apr 1, 2007 18:31:12 GMT -5
Citizens of Earth, who believe the name shouldn't be desecrated into some sort of monstrosity! thats who will. Look, I'm not opposed to Gay men because of the following reason You have three men and one woman in a room, I'm one of the men, the other two are gay and the woman is straight, I have practically no competition. These guys do me a favour, they take out the most attractive and good looking men, and leave the rest of us a better chance... and women look good doing it (well, unless there fat buffs with huge muscles, thats disgusting).
So my point is, we don't have the right to stand in the way, just in the way of destroying a tradition that has lasted hunddreds, if not more than a thousand years!
Marridge is the unification of a man and woman (mostly under god). No im not religious, but if it says under god, it should be.
|
|